Well, why would you?
There's presently an enquiry being conducted by Professor Jim Pratley as to why the numbers of students into courses in Agriculture in Australian universities is in rapid decline so the following information may help inform him.
In spite of exhortations that '
agriculture is now a sexy technologically based industry' the numbers of enrolling students continue to drop.
In spite of agriculture graduates being snapped up by corporate farms and agri-chemical companies, still the numbers decline.
What is missing?
Perhaps the charm isn't in the combination of the words 'agriculture' and 'science'....?
With forecasts of food production needing to double by 2050 to feed the nine billion people on the planet, '
there's been no greater need for agricultural scientists, as now'.

One reason I see for the lack of interest is the disconnection between the growing of highly nutritious food and people. Up until the last three generations, ordinary people - backyarders, farmers, children, anyone and everyone, really, has been responsible for producing at least some of their own food. There has been a generational transfer of knowledge through stories and experience, such as saving seeds, harvesting pumpkins, spotting the desirable attributes of an excellent milking cow or the perfect time to slaughter that sheep for the family.
Agriculture and especially the addition of science has removed the everyday access to growing food so that is now seen as a technical specialist's profession.....and you require university training to be able to do that.
I recently saw the home page of an Australian university's Faculty of Environmental and Agricultural Science. There were four pictures and in every one, the humans all were clad in protective clothing - to grow "food". How natural is that? How safe is that?

Growing food, just like saving seeds and genetics has been a normal part of life processes yet commercial intervention (patented genetically engineered seeds) is preventing this from occurring.
Another reason why young people aren't becoming farmers is because of the commodity-production-economic model.
How atrractive is the following scenario?
You're going to grow wheat, and sheep for wool and meat. To sow the crop, you have to buy the seed, diesel for the tractor (assuming you have equipment already) and if you are in the high synthetic input sector, herbicides, fertilisers and possibly fungicides if there's an outbreak of crown rot. All this has to be paid for before the crop is harvested so about four to six months out.
These are the costs of production which, in every other manufacturing sector,
are added to the final sale price of the goods.
Then, there's the really odd situation of sometimes not even knowing how much per tonne the actual crop is worth until harvest. The variables which can affect this aspect include how much wheat is already in the global pool (more equals less $/tonne), if you have on-farm storage, if there's been rain prior to harvest which causes the shot-and-sprung scenario, and the percentage of screenings which can downgrade to feed-grade, to name a few.
The final price received does not take into account the costs of production which,
IN THIS SYSTEM CANNOT BE ADDED SO A PROFIT CAN BE MADE.
How can you run a viable and reliable enterprise without all the information?
Then there are the sheep producing wool and meat. With the traditional auction selling systems, again you don't know the eventual price offered and the costs of production cannot be added into setting a final price.
While commodity farmers remain price-takers, young people will not enter the industry as this economic model is a ticket to insolvency and perpetual debt.
A recent report from the Chair of the Northern Australia Beef Research Council includes the vast levels of debt most of the producers carry and the difficulty to be profitable, despite productivity gains over the past decade.
Why would anyone, least of all someone under the age of 30, want to be saddled with debt when the first $200,000 always goes to the bank?
How can any sector progress while this is the traditional economic model?
Reality is - it can't and won't.
If we want more young people to become farmers there has to be a 180 degree change from the status quo where it is acceptable and expected that farmers will be price takers. In this situation there is little repsect for the products or the producers.
Farming - not just agriculture - but the full and beautiful gamit of growing food needs a serious make-over, starting with new ways of selling goods so (at least) the costs of production can be added into the final price received. Lowering the costs of production is always a critical component of running a viable business and will always be important. BUT, farming cannnot be a viable economic activity (for farmers) while commodities focus on quantity, not quality and there's no opporunity for growers to make regular profits.
Time to step off the commodity treadmill and do things differently.
Welcome to the exciting world of food!